The Wall Street Journal’s John Fund makes a claim about the 2000 election that is only partially true:

Democratic partisans still argue that the 2000 presidential contest was decided by a single vote in the U.S. Supreme Court, even though media recounts of Florida ballots showed that the outcome would not have been changed if Bush v. Gore had gone the other way.

While it’s true that the outcome would probably not have changed if all the undervotes had been counted, the judge supervising the recount said he might have counted the overvotes as well, a decision that would have tipped the outcome to Gore.