![]() |
||
|---|---|---|
![]() |
||
|
Really wanted to tweet "Here’s a great Charles Blow column!" just once. Even though I agree w/ him, as always the argument is weak and lazy
|
||
![]() |
||
|
Here is it btw http://nyti.ms/fm4bQF
|
||
![]() |
||
|
More on correlates of the Senate earmark Vote http://j.mp/gIr1gk
|
||
| The Monkey Cage: Explaining the Senate Earmark Vote | ||
![]() |
||
|
Abramowitz: "today, just as in the 1960s, Americans tend to be ideological conservatives but operational liberals" http://j.mp/i8xyAx
|
||
Despite gains made by the Republican Party, support for activist government remains very strong. Evidence from Gallup shows that Americans tend to be ideological conservatives but operational li… |
||
![]() |
||
|
.@jbplainblog on how quality of GOP pres. cands. mainly relevant to who wins party nom., not party chances in general: http://bit.ly/febzRm
|
||
| A plain blog about politics: Candidate Reputation and Presidential Elections | ||
![]() |
||
|
UF’s Ragusa: Senate earmark ban vote was driven by ideology, state size, and committee affiliation, not being up in ’12 http://j.mp/dWatsU
|
||
| Voting on the Coburn Amendment: Distributive or Horse Race Politics? | Rule22 | ||
![]() |
||
|
Via @mikeallen, Goldman Sachs bumps 2012 GDP growth forecast to 3.6% http://j.mp/fWDUJ6 (PDF) — good news for Obama re-election prospects
|
||
![]() |
||
|
More from @drjjoyner on how pres. candidates rarely seem presidential in advance: http://j.mp/e1WwaN My original post: http://bit.ly/f6IxBC
|
||
| Presidential Candidates Never Seem Presidential The prospective Republican field for 2012 is dismal. Then again, it always is. |
||
| Presidential challengers usually seem flawed – Brendan Nyhan The Daily Beast’s Benjamin Sarlin quotes a series of GOP consultants claiming the party’s presidential candidates are “weak”: Call it the resurgent Republicans’ Achilles Heel. The GOP may have t… |
||
![]() |
||

